Today was before the district court in Arnsberg take the case against the owner of the cache Vertical Limit . The presiding judge was obviously impressed they were released except the Owner seven other cachers as a spectator. In addition, two representatives of the press.
He said he himself had also been geocaching, but not so dangerous Cache as Vertical Limit. Bothered him above all the log entries of the cache which were without backup on the tower. As is the risk that one could even eventually crash.
principle was not the climbing of the tower, the problem, but only that it needed to enter the property. The fence was evidence of only rudimentary change, not on charges of trespassing.
Even the signs were no longer allowed to enter the tower, did not change it.
He found it irresponsible to such places to hide a cache.
The owner and his lawyer argued and substantiated that they, on the task of the tower, 2007, were of the opinion that this Property was not fenced. He also promised not to hide such a cache.
end result of Owner's reasoning and its lawyer to the fact that this case was closed without payment.
The judge said the legal fees and loss of leisure time would be sufficient. This argument
agreed to the prosecution.
The court costs by the state.
jeoch Such is not a fundamental decision for the other displayed cachers. However, the prosecutor said that you can rely on other methods to that decision.
time to wait now what happens with my method.
I'll think twice at least in future in which I write cache log entry without art and add a photo.
PS: The name of the caches I nenen only now, as keien negative impact is anticipated on the process more.
0 comments:
Post a Comment